Paso Robles News|Saturday, October 21, 2017
You are here: Home » Atascadero » Update: Atascadero council approves medical marijuana cultivation ordinance
  • Follow Us!

Update: Atascadero council approves medical marijuana cultivation ordinance 

Update posted March 23
Medical-Cannabis1

Ordinance would allow limited cultivation

–The Atascadero City Council approved the first reading of an ordinance that would allow the cultivation of medical marijuana within Atascadero city limits at their Tuesday night meeting. The second reading of the ordinance will go before the council on April 12, if approved again it will go in effect 30 days later on May 12.

Unlike other meetings in regards to medical marijuana, there was no comment from the public and no questions or discussion from the city council. In January, the council approved an ordinance that prohibited the cultivation or distribution of medical marijuana via deliveries. After hearing numerous members of the public ask for the council to reconsider that action and allow cultivation in the city, the council took another look at the issue in February and then sent the issue to the planning commission.

The Atascadero Planning Commission heard the issue on March 1 and recommended that the council approve the ordinance presented by staff.

Stipulations of the ordinance:

  • The qualified patient cultivates no more than six mature or 12 immature marijuana plants pursuant to Health and Safety Code sections 11362.5 and 11362.77
  • The qualified patient resides in the dwelling unit on the property where he or she cultivates marijuana
  • The cultivation does not occur on vacant property
  • There are no more than nine mature or 15 immature marijuana plants cultivated on the property by any combination of qualified patients
  • The qualified patient cultivates his or her marijuana plants indoors or in a manner that is screened from view from the public right-of-way or any other property
  • The qualified patient does not sell, distribute, donate, or provide the marijuana that he or she cultivates to any other person

 

This ordinance will continue the prohibition of cultivation and distribution centers in the city of Atascadero. The qualified patient must reside in the home where the marijuana is cultivated.

Original story from Feb. 15, 2016:

Atascadero to discuss allowing limited medical marijuana cultivation

–Atascadero City Council is reconsidering what they say was a rushed decision to ban the cultivation of medical marijuana within the city limits. AB21, a state Assembly bill that would remove a March 1 deadline for local governments to enact marijuana regulations, was signed by Gov. Jerry Brown on Feb. 3 after successfully passing the State Assembly in a 65-to-zero vote the previous Thursday.

City Manager Rachelle Rickard presented four different options for the council to consider to address concerned raised by both members of the public and council members.

The four options:

  1. Begin a public process immediately and move forward with an analysis irrespective of any potential ballot measures in November.
  2. Adopt an ordinance that allows personal cultivation at a level consistent with what is currently allowed by the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 as a place holder until it is known what might happen as a result of a potential November ballot measures.
  3. Leave the ordinance just adopted in place until after the potential November ballot issue is decided by the voters. At some point after the November election, council would evaluate the policy based on local desires and the legislation in place at the time.
  4. Repeal the cultivation ban and re-adopt the city’s previous medical marijuana ordinance.

The council went with option four with some additional restrictions. The council gave direction to staff to take a draft ordinance that would look at allowing limited production within the city to the planning commission on March 1.

The council directed that the ordinance should include the ban the cultivation of marijuana on vacant land, limit up to eight ounces of dried marijuana, 12 immature and six mature plants per person and not to exceed 15 immature and nine mature plants per dwelling, no cultivation in the yard as as defined by staff and the ordinance would only extend to individuals, not collectives.

Several council members expressed concern going through with Option 1 because of the possibility of ballot measures going through in regards to adult marijuana use.

“I think we’re just fighting an uphill battle until we know the results of November,” Councilman Bob Kelley said. “I’m kind of inclined to Option 3. Let’s wait and see what the outcome is.”

“[Option 1] could be a waste of our time and resources,” Councilman Brian Sturtevant said. “I’d like to see some lifting of the ban. The only reason I voted for the ban because it’s what we needed to comply with state law.”

While both Mayor Tom O’Malley and Mayor Pro Tem Heather Moreno said they preferred Option 4, or a hybrid with Option 2, Councilwoman Roberta Fonzi said she’s not comfortable going back to the old ordinance.

“It’s a lot of work, it’s a lot of legal work. Do we need to do that?” Fonzi said. “I just don’t see it. I don’t see why we’d want to go back to something that didn’t work in the first place. I understand, certainly, that there is a need for medical marijuana and I sympathize for those that use it for a legitimate use. However, I have to side with the safety issue. … as elected officials we are here to protect [the community]. There is a very small number that are actually causing problems, but they are causing problems. I’d like to wait until November and see where we are.”

With the majority of the council expressing the desire to lift the strict ban on cultivation, Fonzi suggested a number of restrictions she would like addressed in a proposed ordinance. In the roll call vote, Fonzi said “yes, with reservation.”

For information on the upcoming Atascadero Planning Commission meeting on March 1, go to the city’s website.

Subscribe to daily news



Join our 4,475 daily email subscribers



Share this post!Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on Twitter

Comments

Add a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.