Paso Robles News|Tuesday, April 28, 2026
You are here: Home » Politics » City Council hikes water rates

    City Council hikes water rates 

    city council

    –At Tuesday night’s Paso Robles City council meeting, the council voted to increase water service rates starting in January and begin notifying customers.

    On Nov. 18, 2014 the city authorized the preparation and update of the city’s water and sewer rates and water facility charges. The analysis of water rates and facility charges found that the fund’s cash balance is lower than projected due to previous delays in adopting rates, overall community water conservation, and significantly lower water sales in response to the drought. Without a water rate increase, the fund would go broke by fiscal year 2022-23, according to the analysis.

    water rate increase paso robles

    Paso Robles owns and operates approximately 174 miles of waterlines, four storage facilities, and seven booster stations to distribute potable water throughout the city. A system of 20 wells and water from Lake Nacimiento supplies drinking water, with a surface water treatment plant soon to go into operation.

    The Water Operations Fund as reported in the city’s “Comprehensive Annual Financial Report” operated at $12.1 million for FY 13-14 and has a projected total annual operating expense of $13 million for FY 15-16 with revenues generated primarily from user fees and water facility charges (also referred to as connection fees). Current revenues are approximately $9.6 million per year, thus falling short of meeting annual requirements.

    Current water rates went into effect on January 1, 2012, with the last annual water rate increase scheduled to go into effect on Jan. 1, 2016. As of that date, all customers will pay $4.40 per hundred cubic feet (HCF) of metered water usage.proposed monthly water bill paso robles

    An initial fixed charge of $5 per account per month was authorized by the council. This fixed charge is designed to cover the current cost of utility billing and administration, a service provided by the water utility that is evenly shared amongst all users. The fixed charge is proposed to increase to $10 per account per month over a 5-year period to provide additional fixed cost coverage and a measure of stability.

    Some members of the public expressed frustration that while the city’s constituents were cutting back on water use, rates were rising. The idea of a tier system was suggested, as well as a flat fee that would cover the entire cost of the water system. According to Public Works Director Dick McKinley, flat rates would have to be close to $75 per month per user to cover the entire cost, and it would be charged regardless of water use.water rate comparison slo county

    Councilman Fred Strong called the decision a, “no brainer,” considering that without a rate increase, the fund would go broke by 2022. Strong said that for decades, city council members have been, “kicking the can down the road,” in regards to unpopular decisions such as this one, and that recent city councils have begun to take action in making sure that the city remains financially solvent in the future.

    The rate proposal is subject to a protest ballot process, according to City Manager Jim App. Customers/property owners have a minimum of 45 days to protest the proposed rates. If a majority protest, the rates may not be adopted/implements.  Failing a majority protest, the council may adopt the rates and implement on the schedule included in the rate proposal (which includes a rate increase for each of the five years beginning January 2017).

    The council approved the rate increases 5-0.

    Share To Social Media
    Follow this discussion
    Notify of
    1 Comment
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Randy Douglas

    These so-called civil servants think they can make stuff up as they go. The last water rate increase hasn't ended yet, but already the taxing/feeing/wasting/lying bureaucrats want more. They think if they invent some hyper-inflated monetary projections, then we'll just cough up the cash to meet their demands. Those projected cost amounts are about as real as the good judgement of this city council. They are pure conjecture. Nothing has changed to justify any more increases. VOTE your PROTEST to stop this idiocy.
    Our city 'fathers' proclaimed that the previous outragious water rate increase was ALL they needed to cover the future costs of water improvements/additions/upgrades, etc., etc. The Feb 2011 Water Rate Increase explains all this. Now we're supposed to believe THESE MUCH HIGHER figures are the real rates necessary. What a bunch of liver sausage…

    Follow this discussion
    Notify of
    1 Comment
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Randy Douglas

    These so-called civil servants think they can make stuff up as they go. The last water rate increase hasn't ended yet, but already the taxing/feeing/wasting/lying bureaucrats want more. They think if they invent some hyper-inflated monetary projections, then we'll just cough up the cash to meet their demands. Those projected cost amounts are about as real as the good judgement of this city council. They are pure conjecture. Nothing has changed to justify any more increases. VOTE your PROTEST to stop this idiocy.
    Our city 'fathers' proclaimed that the previous outragious water rate increase was ALL they needed to cover the future costs of water improvements/additions/upgrades, etc., etc. The Feb 2011 Water Rate Increase explains all this. Now we're supposed to believe THESE MUCH HIGHER figures are the real rates necessary. What a bunch of liver sausage…

    Subscribe button for Paso Robles Daily News
    1
    0
    Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
    ()
    x